A 65B dense model just claimed the U.S. open coding lead: Ripple-65B Preview ๐
Most of the open coding race this year has been about bigger Mixture-of-Experts stacks. More total parameters, more experts, more serving complexity. This week a small U.S. lab took the opposite bet, and I like it a lot. Ricursive Intelligence released Ripple-65B Preview: a dense 65-billion-parameter model, pretrained from scratch on 12 trillion tokens, with weights on Hugging Face under Apache 2.0.
What they claim
On their model card and launch page, Ripple scores 80.52 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, just ahead of Reflection Beam 501B at 80.1, and well ahead of Meta Muse Spark Open 816B (76.4), Thinking Machines Inkling 975B (63.8) and NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Ultra 550B (56.4) in that comparison. On SWE-bench Pro v2.0 Hard they report 79.1. Those are vendor numbers, and the lead on Terminal-Bench is narrow, so treat them as a strong invitation to test, not as a settled crown. Still: a 65B dense model sitting next to models with hundreds of billions of total parameters is the interesting part.
Why dense matters here
Ricursive built Ripple to power its own AI chip-design platform, then released a general-purpose preview. The architecture is deliberately simple: a thin-and-deep Transformer with 80 layers and d_model 5120, designed for NVIDIA hardware. They say they kept about 40% MFU through pretraining and posttraining with plain sharding, no custom kernels and no quantization during training. Full R&D cost, including ladders, data, evals and the final runs: $32 million, which they frame as roughly one-tenth of the previous U.S. open-weight coding SOTA.
They also report reaching that Terminal-Bench score with about 1.4 million RL rollouts, far fewer than the prior leader's published figure. Again: different setups, different accounting. The honest takeaway is the direction of travel. Careful model laddering from an Olmo 3 baseline, synthetic posttraining data they generated themselves, and a dense envelope that is easier to train and to serve.
Why I care
For agents and coding tools, total parameter count is less useful than what you can actually run. Ripple ships BF16 and NVFP4 instruct checkpoints plus a BF16 base, and Ricursive points at local boxes like NVIDIA DGX Spark. Hosted endpoints are already listed on Hugging Face, Together AI, GMI Cloud, OpenRouter and Fireworks. Apache 2.0 means you can adapt it commercially without a special model-license deal.
I will not pretend every benchmark is settled. On DeepSWE 1.1, Meta's Muse Spark Open still leads in their own table. Context advertised at up to 1M tokens may not match every hoster's live limit. What is clear is the pattern: smaller dense open weights, trained with discipline, competing on agentic coding. That is exactly the kind of release that helps people building real tools, not just demos.
Sources
- Introducing Ripple-65B Preview (Ricursive)
- ricursiveAI/Ripple-65B-Preview on Hugging Face
- VentureBeat coverage (4 November 2026)
Would you rather ship a coding agent on a 65B dense open model you can host yourself, or keep waiting for the next trillion-parameter MoE?
Reacties
Een reactie posten